Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166510 (ALL)

RASHID ALI v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS

/5753/2025 · 2025-09-23

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5753 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 2 and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1 to decide the Appeal No. 2143/2024 (Mohd. Mustakim and others Vs. Mohammad Aslam and others), under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code within any stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration) Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya is desired to make all endeavor to decide the Appeal No. 2143/2024 (Mohd. Mustakim and others Vs. Mohammad Aslam and others), under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of two months from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Rashid Ali .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5753 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench