IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14943 of 2016 ====================================================== Mantun Mochi Son of Late Dukhan Mochi, Resident of Village- Bala Bakhar, P.O.- Gehuma Beria, Block- Phulparas, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. 3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Madhubani. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer,Phulparas, District-Madhubani. 5. The Circle Officer, Phulparas, District- Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Narayan Mahto For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raj Kishore Roy-Gp18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 29-07-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(a) be the respondents to demarcating the land of purcha holder which has been issued by the Circle Officer, Phulparas in the year 1971 from khata no.425, Plot no.3314 total area 1 katha 1 dhur which was of land lord under village Balabakhar, Panchayat Gehumana Beria, Anchal Phulparas, Distries Madhubani and Patna High Court CWJC No.14943 of 2016(2) dt.29-07-2025 2/2 after demarcating the land further give the direction to fix the area 1 katha I dhur and give the possession to the petitioner according to purcha from the above mentioned land. 3. A counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 to 5 is on record according to which, upon local inspection on the land in question, the possession of Anand Mochi/family members as also a building was found. 4. The further statement in the counter affidavit is that the petitioner is having pucca house on the residential land at Mauza-Gehumana Beria of Phulparas in the district of Madhubani and is not a landless person. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the appropriate Revenue authority for the redressal of the grievance. 6. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U