IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9539 of 2025 Date of Decision:16.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Dharminder Kumar …….Petitioner Versus Union of India & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Tanuj Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner states that his client would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 10.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner, in a time bound manner. Mr. Balram Sharma learned Deputy Solicitor General of India representing the respondents fairly states that representation filed by the petitioner, if not already decided, shall be decided expeditiously. 2. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 10.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate order. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if he still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 16,2025 (shankar)