HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9065 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri N.K. Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, the learned AGA for the State. 2. By means of the instant petitioner filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity of certain judicial orders passed by the leaned Spl. Judge, P.C. Act, Lucknow as well as the learned Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.), Lucknow. 3. Learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection that in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Neeta Singh & Ors. v. The State of U.P. & Ors. in SLP (Criminal) No.13578 of 2024 and Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni v. State of Maharasthra & Anr.; (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1948, the writ petition filed challenging validity of judicial orders is not maintainable. 4. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant writ petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with the law. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed leaving the aforesaid liberty open for the petitioner. 6. Let certified copies of the orders annexed with the writ petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies on record. September 23, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : N.K. Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Smt. Sheela Shukla And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench