Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16646 (AP)

Mukkala Koteswara Rao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/9850/2019 · 2025-01-02

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010223282019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9850/2019 Between: Mukkala Koteswara Rao, ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA IRLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not filing charge sheet in FIR No.267 of 2018 of Krosuru Police Station, Guntur District and further action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment over the 2 land being an extent of Ac. 0.39 cents of agricultural land in Sy.No. 2-1B situated in Gudipadu Village, Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District, at the instance of the respondents 5 and 6 as illegal, contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to file charge sheet in the above crime and pass such…” 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either physically or through Video Conference today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ ___ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 02.01.2025. RMD/PSA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9850 of 2019 Date: 02.01.2025 RMD/PSA