HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11367 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 & 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. The grievance of the petitioners is that despite their juniors having received higher pay and consequently, are now receiving higher pension, the respondents have failed to give enhanced pay and pension the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 & 3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit individual representations within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra, Akansha Pathak, Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Yadav Shyam Dhar Verma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 23, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 11367 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench