MOHAMMAD UZAIR AND 98 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE LKO. AND 33 OTHERS
WRIA/11398/2025 · 2025-09-25
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166449 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166449 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11398 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents. 2. The captioned writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, inter alia therein for the following reliefs:-
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the opposite parties to pay the Petitioners' salary in the grade pay of Rs.2800/-, as is being paid to the similarly situated incumbents, in the light of the judgement and order dated 04.07.2023 passed by this Court in "Writ-A No.20255 of 20221;Kamal Deep Nirala & Ors. vs State of U.P. & Ors.;
2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to pay the arrears of salary arising therefrom;"
3. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioners that the controversy involved in this petition, as to whether the Health Workers appointed after 01.12.2011 are entitled for Grade Pay of Rs.2,800/- had already been settled by this Court vide judgment and order dated 04.07.2023 passed in Writ-A No.20255 of 2021; Kamal Deep Nirala and another vs. State of U.P. and another. It has further been contended that the Special Appeal filed against the said judgment and order dated 04.07.2023 had already been dismissed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also brought to the notice of this Court that in identical matters this Court had already passed various orders, whereby the petitioners of those writ petition have been granted benefit of the judgment and order dated 04.07.2023 passed in Writ-A No.20255 of 2021. 5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State does not dispute that the facts of this case are identical to the facts of this case in Writ-A Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kshitij Mishra, Eshita Bhasin, Ramendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mohammad Uzair And 98 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Medical Health And Family Welfare Lko. And 33 Others .....Respondent(s)
No.20255 of 2021. He has also admitted that the persons identically placed to the petitioners had already been granted benefit of the judgment and order dated 04.07.2023 in various writ petitions, by this Court. 6.
I have considered the submissions made by learned counsels appearing for the parties and I find that it is admitted amongst the parties that the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 04.07.2023 passed by this Court in Writ-A No.20255 of 2021. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the judgment and order dated 04.07.2023 passed in Writ-A No.20255 of 2023. September 25, 2025 Shahnaz WRIA No. 11398 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench