Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166437 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR SHARMA (S.I. , PNO-902463095) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/11154/2025 · 2025-09-22

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11154 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for considering petitioner's case for promotion on the post of Inspector in Civil Police in light of Government Order dated 06.05.2022. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Additional Director General of Police (Establishment), D.G.P. Headquarter, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. September 22, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.P. Raju Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vinod Kumar Sharma (S.I. , Pno-902463095) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench