Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166426 (ALL)

AWDESH PRATAP SINGH AND OTHERS v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND 3 OTHERS

/5730/2025 · 2025-09-23

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5730 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Ramu Patel hodling brief of Shri Amti Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 4 and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent no. 2, is dispensed with. 2. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:- "to issue an order or direction to decide the stay application pending in Appeal No. 3385/2025 (C202404000003385), Awdhesh Pratap Singh and others Vs. Dhirendra Vikram Singh and others under Section 38(4) of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 filed by the petitioners on 27.12.2024 before the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Region Ayodhya i.e. opposite party no.1 contained as Annexure No.1 to this petition." 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the appeal preferred by the petitioners has been admitted but no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served. 4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the application for interim relief with expedition, say within next six weeks. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Awdesh Pratap Singh And Others .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. . September 23, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5730 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench