Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16642 (JHR)

SAFRAN KHAN ALIAS SAFRAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3823/2024 · 2025-02-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3823 of 2024 ------ Safran Khan @ Safran Ansari, aged about 20 years, s/o Pacham Salim Miyan, r/o Village-Barwenagar Chainpur, P.O.-Barwenagar & P.S.-Chainpur, Dist.-Gumla (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.08 Dated- 11.02.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.08 of 2024 (G.R. No. 246 of 2024) registered under sections 25(1-B)(a)/26 of Arms Act. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is an arms supplier and from the co-accused one China made pistol and five live cartridges were recovered. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and except the disclosure statement of the co-accused, there is no material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the anticipatory bail application and the petitioner is an unemployed person. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 50,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gumla, in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.08 of 2024 (G.R. No. 246 of 2024) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-