$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 139/2025, CM APPL. 24112/2025-Stay NIRMALA KOHLI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Saxena, Mr. Kaustabh Bhardwaj, Mr. Ajay Sejwal and Ms. Namrata Bhatia, Advs. versus HOTEL ZODIAC PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Gupta and Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 10.09.2025 1. This order is in continuation of the earlier orders dated 24.04.2025, 29.07.2025, 14.08.2025 and 03.09.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/ tenant reiterates that the petitioner/ tenant is willing to vacate the subject premises on or before 31.10.2025, albeit, without paying any user and occupation charges. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/ landlord, on the other hand, submits that the subject premises involved has already been sublet by the petitioner/ tenant to the third party, and the petitioner/ tenant is resultantly earning as much as Rs.3,00,000/- per month towards rent thereof. He submits that, in any event, the petitioner/ tenant has not paid rent for the past ten years, moreover, till date, petitioner/ tenant has also failed to pay any amount towards user and occupation charges. 4. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances, there is nothing This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2025 at 12:29:13 surviving in the present petition. As such, it is deemed appropriate to dismiss the present petition without interfering with the impugned order dated 14.10.2024 passed by learned CCJ-Cum-ARC, Central Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in RC ARC 152/2019 titled as “Hotel Zodiac Pvt. Ltd. v. Nirmala Kohli”, whereby the eviction petition of the respondent/ landlord was allowed and the petitioner/ tenant was directed to handover vacant and physical possession of the subject premises being one shop situated at ground floor in property Municipal No.7A/5 situated at W.E.F, Karol Bagh, New Delhi to the respondent/ landlord. 5. Accordingly, the present revision petition along with the pending application is dismissed. 6. Needless to say, the respondent/ landlord shall be free to recover the user and occupation charges qua the subject premises from the petitioner/ tenant through appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law. SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2025/So This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2025 at 12:29:13