HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8110 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the applicant to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every eight cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all the eight cases. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in eight cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1) Case Crime No. 444 of 2019, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 386, 302 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. 2) Case Crime No. 60 of 2018, under Sections 147/148/323/325 IPC and Sections 3(1) da, dha & 3(2)5 of SC/ST Act, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. 3) Case Crime No. 128 of 2018, under SEctions 147/323/504/506 IPC, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arti Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chandra Shekhar Kesarwani .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 4) Case Crime No. 215 of 2018, under Sections 147/148/452/504/506 IPC, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. 5) Case Crime NO. 458 of 2019, under Section 307 IPC, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. 6) Case Crime No. 457 of 2019, under Section 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. 7) Case Crime No. 154 of 2018, under Sections 307/394/411 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Sultanpur. 8) Case Crime No. 0395 of 2020, under Section 2/3(1) of U.P. Gangster Act, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioners to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). Considering the aforesaid fact, the application is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. September 24, 2025 kkv/ A482 No. 8110 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench