Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166401 (ALL)

BAL FOT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND 9 OTHERS

/998/2025 · 2025-09-23

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 998 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "I. Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Party No. 2 to 4 for removal of illegal /unlawful encroachment of the Private Opposite Parties ie, opposite party no-6 to 10 from the Public Utility road i.e. Gata No. 506, 660 and 661 of Village - Sonbarsa, Tehsil - Bhinga, District - Shrawasti, which is recorded as रास्ता, हिरजन आबादी एवं खाद गड्ढा in the revenue records." 3. Learned Standing Counsel based upon the instructions states that the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code have been initiated against the respondents including against the petitioner. 4. In view of the said instructions, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to conclude the proceedings within a period of 90 days as prescribed in the statute and in accordance with law. September 23, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Raman Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Bal Fot .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench