KULWANT SINGH RANA v. STATE TH. HOME DEPTT. AND ORS.
OWP/51/2019 · 2025-08-11
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1664 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1664 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 51/2019 CM No. 617/2019 [1/2019]
Kulwant Singh Rana
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 11.08.2025
1. Perusal of the record would reveal that for the last two consecutive dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Same is the position today as well.
2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition, as such, the instant petition along with the connected application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 11.08.2025 Sahil Padha
Serial No. 19 Sahil Padha 2025.08.11 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document