Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166382 (ALL)

CHANDAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME AT LKO.

BAIL/9078/2025 · 2025-09-24

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9078 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Puttu Lal Misra, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Manish Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.23 of 2025, under Sections 109(1) of B.N.S. and Sections 3/5/25/27(1) of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged by an Inspector of Police on 13.01.2025 stating that on the basis of an information received from a mukhbir, the police has apprehended four persons riding on 2 motorcycles. The applicant and co-accused Sonu Yadav have been arrested and the other two persons escaped from the spot. 4. In their custodial statements, the accused persons confessed that the motorcycles were stolen and they confessed their involvement in commission of several offences. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in five other criminal cases has been disclosed in para 18 of the affidavit, in four of which the applicant has been granted bail. 6. Co-accused Sonu Yadav has been granted bail by means of an order dated 10.07.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Bail Application No.6362 of 2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Puttu Lal Misra, Prince Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chandan Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home At Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during the investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 11.03.2025. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant also on bail in the aforesaid crime on the ground of parity. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant - Chandan Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 24, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9078 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench