APHC010221652016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2115/2016 Between: 1. SHAIK NAZEER MOHAMMED, S/O. SHAIK DAVOOD, AGED: 52 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE IN A.P.STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION, NEAR MANDAPADU RAILWAY GATE, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, NEAR R.R.KALYANAMANDAPAM, GUDIWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SINGAMSETTI SRINIVASU ANOTHER, S/O ATCHUTA RAMAYYA, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.8-121, INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA RURAL MANDALAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION, WARE HOUSING SADAN, 2ND FLOOR, BEHIND GANDHI BHAVAN, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the order dated 27-02-2016 passed in E.P.No.90 of 2015 in O.S.No.105 of 2014 on the file of II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 2711 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 grant stay the order dated: 27-2-2016 passed in EP No. 90 of 2015 in OS No. 105 of 2014 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A K KISHORE REDDY 2. K SATYA SRINIVASA RAO(SC FOR APSWC) 3 The Court made the following Order: Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 23.07.2025 BMS