MOHD. RASHID v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIFE SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/8967/2025 · 2025-09-26
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166371 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166371 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8967 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to opposite party no. 4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 10.8.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 0214 of 2025, for the offence under Section 212,217,189,285 of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (BNS), 2023, registered at Police Station Jahangirganj, District Ambedkar Nagar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 5. Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in re ; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Gyan Chandra Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohd. Rashid .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chife Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
another : (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8. However, It is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 30.09.2025 at 11.00 a.m. sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation.
Thereafter, he shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, the protection of this order would be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. September 26, 2025 Om CRLP No. 8967 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench