1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 227 of 2022  Sumita Sarkar W/o Shri Bhavesh Chandra Sarkar Aged About 39 Years D/o Shri K.C. Mazumdar, R/o Kumhar Para (Maa Santoshi Bhawan), Fafadih, Police Station Moudhapara, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Bhavesh Chandra Sarkar S/o Shri S.C. Sarkar Aged About 43 Years R/o Mig -1/347, Housing Board Colony, Devrikhurd, Police Station Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2. S.C. Sarkar S/o Late Shri Sharad Chandra Sarkar Aged About 74 Years R/o Mig -1/347, Housing Board Colony, Devrikhurd, Police Station Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3. Smt. Jharna Sarkar W/o Shri S.C Sarkar Aged About 69 Years R/o Mig -1/347, Housing Board Colony, Devrikhurd, Police Station Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4. Pinki @ Pinaki D/o S.C. Sarkar Aged About 30 Years R/o Mig -1/347, Housing Board Colony, Devrikhurd, Police Station Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None For Respondents No. 1 and 2 : Mr. Anukul Biswas, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 01-09-2025 1) By way of this petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:- 10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to deposit the maintenance amount of Rs. 16,20,000/- and monthly future Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.09.01 18:03:12 +0530 2 maintenance in favour of petitioner. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the execution court of JMFC Raipur in MJC No.908/2017 in the matter of Sumita Sarkar Vs Bhavesh Chandra Sarkar and others may be disposed off as early as possible within one month. 10.3 Any other relief, which may be deemed, fit by this Hon'ble Court just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided in favour of the petitioner. 2) Learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2 submits that the order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate – First Class, Raipur in a proceeding initiated under Section 9 (b) and 37 (2)(c) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 dated 21.04.2016 has already been set-aside by the learned appellate Court vide its order dated 02.06.2022, thus this petition has become infructuous. 3) Heard. 4) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Biswas and perusal of the order dated 02.06.2022 passed by learned appellate Court, this petition stands dismissed being rendered infrcuctuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya