Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166367 (ALL)

WAQF HAJI FAQEER MOHAMMAD THRU. MUTAWALI NOOR ALAM v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS

A227/5702/2025 · 2025-09-22

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5702 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Case No.1334 of 2002-2003, (Computerized Case No.T200304000000024), under Section 333 of U.P. Z.R. and L.R. Act, 1950, "Waqf Haji Faqeer Mohammad vs. Ram Kumar Kori and other", expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide Case Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Syed Mohd. Munis Jafari, Syed Mohd. Mohsin Jafari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Waqf Haji Faqeer Mohammad Thru. Mutawali Noor Alam .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) No.3501 of 2022, (Computerized Case No.T202204230303501), under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, "Rajesh Kumar Saroj and others vs. Sheetaldin", expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5702 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench