HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6946/2020 Shishpal Singh S/o Shri Hanumana Ram, aged about 57 Years, R/o Village Ajeetpura, Via Kudan, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Government of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar. 3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Dhod, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D.Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Sharma and Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore for Mr. S.S. Naruka-AAG Mr. Kesar Singh Shekhawat-AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/01/2025 1. By way of filing of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondents to grant him regular pay scale and other benefits on completion of ten years of service on the post of Gram Sevak. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in a batch of appeals with the lead case of D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1298/2014 (State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Thakar Ram, (2 of 2) [CW-6946/2020] decided on 10.11.2014). Counsel submits that the instant petition be disposed of in light of the directions issued in the case of Thakar Ram (Supra). 3. Counsel for the respondents oppose the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner but they are not in a position to controvert the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Looking to the fact that the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of Thakar Ram (Supra), the instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation/notice for demand of justice submitted by the petitioner in their office way back in the year 2019 and in case, they found that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of Thakar Ram (Supra), the similar benefits be extended to the petitioner as well. 5. Needless to observe that the respondents would decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible not beyond a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 6. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/40