RAM UDIT AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/9321/2025 · 2025-10-07
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9321 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners very outset submits that against the impugned order the petitioners have efficacious remedy of revision which provision has been incorporated in the Revenue Code by means of amendment, of which the petitioners were not aware at the time of filing of this writ petition.
2. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail statutory remedy.
3. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
4. It is provided that in case the petitioner prefers application for interim relief along with revision, the same shall be considered, expeditiously, in accordance with law, say within a period of three weeks.
5. The registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to learned counsel for the petitioners, while retaining the photo stat copies of the same. October 7, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Mool Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Udit And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench