Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166343 (MAD)

Gnanaprakasam v. The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts

WP(MD)/29580/2024 · 2025-02-10

Battu Devanand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.29580 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.02.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD).No.29580 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD).Nos.24959, 24961 and 24962 of 2024 1. Gnanaprakasam 2. K.Kamalam 3. T.Yogaprabha 4. M.Arulprabha 5. Tmt.D.Selvapandi 6. D.Saravanakumar 7. T.Dhivya ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Integrated Finance Department Complex, 3rd Floor, Nandhanam, Anna Salai, Chennai - 35 2. The Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Tiruchirappalli 3. The Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Dindigul. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.29580 of 2024 4. P. Ramachandran, Accountant, District Treasury, Villupuram. (The 4th respondent representing himself and for other similarly placed persons in the impugned list) ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to impugned tentative list of Accountants in Pdl. 182/2024/N1 dated 22.11.2024 issued by the 1st respondent and to quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to prepare the State wide inter-se seniority list of direct recruit and promotees in the post of Accountants in the list and then follow the procedure contemplated for giving promotion as per “Rule 2 & 9” of the Tamil Nadu Treasuries and Accounts Subordinate Services Special Rules. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For R1 to R3 : Mr.Veerakathiravan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.29580 of 2024 ORDER Mr.Veerakathiravan, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3 on instructions would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this writ petition, the writ petition becomes infructuous and no further adjudication is required. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also endorsed the same. 2. In view of the above factual position, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 10.02.2025 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.29580 of 2024 BATTU DEVANAND, J. rgm To 1. The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Integrated Finance Department Complex, 3rd Floor, Nandhanam, Anna Salai, Chennai - 35 2. The Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Tiruchirappalli 3. The Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Dindigul. 4. P. Ramachandran, Accountant, District Treasury, Villupuram. W.P.(MD).No.29580 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD).Nos.24959, 24961 and 24962 of 2024 10.02.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis