Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16634 (JHR)

FAHAD KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5676/2025 · 2025-07-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:18688] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5676 of 2025 ------ Fahad Khan, aged about 28 years, son of Gayah Khan @ Md. Gyas Uddin, resident of Village- Phulwari, P.O.+P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna, Bihar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-10-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D/84C of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cyber crime and he has defrauded the victims Raj Kishor Gupta, Shivangi Jain, Shiman Das, Subhankar Mondal to the tune of Rs.24,999/-, Rs.15,010/-, Rs.23,300/- and Rs.5,100/- respectively. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that two mobile phones along with three SIM Cards were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.03.2025 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to transfer Rs.24,999/-, Rs.15,010/-, Rs.23,300/- and Rs.5,100/- to the Bank Account of Raj Kishor Gupta, Shivangi Jain, Shiman Das, Subhankar Mondal respectively without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transfer of Rs.24,999/-, Rs.15,010/-, Rs.23,300/- and Rs.5,100/- to the Bank Account of Raj Kishor Gupta, Shivangi Jain, Shiman Das, Subhankar Mondal respectively without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/