HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5793 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for expeditious disposal of Review Application No. 18 of 2003-04 (Vijendra Singh Vs. Satish and others). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1- Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide the Review Application No. 18 of 2003-04 (Vijendra Singh Vs. Satish and others), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Basant Lal Yadav, Dileep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Satish And Others .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lko. Thru. Chairman And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5793 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench