RAMESH CHANDRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. COMMISSIONER JUDICAL, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/5676/2025 · 2025-09-19
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166333 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166333 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5676 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset has submitted that he may be permitted to implead the 'Gaon Panhayat, Gopalpur, Pargana Chanda, Tehsil Lambua, district Sultanpur' as opposite party. On his request, he is permitted to implead 'Gaon Panhayat, Gopalpur, Pargana Chanda, Tehsil Lambua, district Sultanpur' as opposite party no. 3 during course of the day. A copy of the petition has been served to Sri Govind Kumar Chaurasia
learned counsel appearing under the authority of Sri Mohan Singh learned counsel who usually appears on behalf of the Gaon Sabha, Sultanpur. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private respondents is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seeks expeditious disposal of the revision no. 353 of 2024 pending before the court of Additional Commissioner(Judicial) Ayodhaya. It is urged that the matter had already been heard on 7.8.2024 and the matter was reserved, however thereafter no order was passed and thereafter again repeated adjournments have been sought, In the aforesaid circumstances, the proceedings be expedited. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Vaibhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramesh Chandra And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Commissioner Judical, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s)
Considering the facts and circumstances and without entering into the merit of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice can be served by directing the court concerned to expedite the hearing of the revision. It is made clear that court has not examined the case of either of the parties and the court concerned shall decide the proceedings on its own merit. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the petition stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 kanhaiya A227 No. 5676 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench