Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16633 (RAJ)

PRATIBHA ARYA v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CW/7187/2018 · 2025-08-01

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29537] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7199/2018 Atma Ram Meena S/o Laddu Lal Meena, R/o Village Chainpura, Post Dhikolia, Tehsil Uniara, District Tonk, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Primary Education, Bikaner ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7187/2018 Pratibha Arya D/o Ram Swaroop Arya, R/o 1/194-195, Kala Kua Swb, Housing Board, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Primary Education, Bikaner. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7194/2018 Karan Singh S/o Ramniwas Jangir, R/o Vpo Moi Purani, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Primary Education, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 01/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that with passage of time, the prayer made in the instant petitions have become infructuous, therefore, they do not press the writ petitions. [2025:RJ-JP:29537] (2 of 2) [CW-7199/2018] 2. Accordingly, instant petitions are dismissed as not press. 3. Stay applications and any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /31-33