HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 970 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 30.09.2023 whereby the registration of the petitioner has been cancelled. The petitioner also challenges the order dated 11.09.2025 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected on the ground of delay. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the impugned order is a non-speaking order. He relies upon a judgment passed by this Court in the case of M/s Chandra Sain, Sarda Nagar, Lucknow Thru. Its Proprietor v. U.O.I & Ors. (Writ Tax No.147 of 2022) on 22.09.2022. I have perused the impugned order, which is patently non-speaking order. Considering the fact that a similar issue has been decided by this Court in the case of M/s Chandra Sain (supra), the present writ petition deserves to be allowed on the same ground and reasoning. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. Impugned orders dated 30.03.2023 and 11.09.2025 are set aside. The matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority to pass fresh order after Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sanjay Machinery Store Thru .Authorized Signatory,Arun Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ins. Finance U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. September 22, 2025 nishant WTAX No. 970 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench