[2025:RJ-JP:32418-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 523/2025 Gyanendra Shukla S/o Kamal Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Mirjapura @ Todhakpur, Police Station Lalganj, District Raibarely, Uttar Pradesh Presently Tenant House Of Pappu Meena, Opposite 21 Number Bus Stand Near Vaishali City, Sirsi Road, Meenawala, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur. Through Brother Raghvendra Kumar S/o Kamal Kumar, Aged About 36 Years R/o Taudhakpur, Lalganj, Rae Bareli, Lalganj Bazar, Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Director General Of Police (Prisoners), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector And District Magistrate, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sarthak Choubey, Mr.Harshit Sharma for Mr.Ajeet Singh Devanda For Respondent(s) : Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr.Aman Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 19/08/2025 1. This petition is filed aggrieved of rejection of prayer for second parole. The petitioner was convicted under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. The petitioner applied for second parole which was denied vide order dated 28.01.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:32418-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-523/2025] 2. It was stated that on the given address, family members of the petitioner are not residing. The report dated 11.08.2025 produced by learned GA-cum-AAG is taken on record. As per the report dated 11.08.2025 sent by Superintendent of Police, Raebareli, family of the petitioner is residing at the given address but there is an apprehension of breach of public peace as the petitioner is an accused in a case bearing No.24/2006 for the offence u/s 302, 201 & 377 IPC. 3. Considering that the rejection was on the ground that the family is not residing on the given address which is wrong as per the report received. 4. The impugned order qua the petitioner is set aside and the matter is remitted to the respondents to decide afresh in accordance with law. 5. The criminal writ petition is allowed. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/27