SURBESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/9296/2025 · 2025-09-22
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166284 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166284 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9296 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for the State-opposite party nos.1 & 2 and perused the record.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to opposite party nos.3 to 7 is hereby dispensed with.
3. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following main prayer(s):
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of in the nature of Mandamus by issuing direction to opposite parties to maintain status quo with respect of Bhumi Gata No. 669, 208, 210, and 209 situated in Village Kheda Mugal, Pargana Nagal, Tehseel Devband, District Saharanpur to final disposal of revision no. 3985 of 2025, Computer Case No. R 20250960003985, Surbesh Versus Sonou Kumar and others pending before the board of revenue in the interest of justice. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus by issuing direction to opposite parties no. 3 to 7 not to sell Bhumi Gata No. 669, 208, 210, and 209 situated in Village Kheda Mugal, Pargana Nagal, Tehseel Devband, District Saharanpur to final disposal of revision no. 3985 of 2025, Computer Case No. R 20250960003985, Surbesh Versus Sonou Kumar and others pending before the board of revenue in the interest of justice" Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Surbesh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. After going through the pleadings on record, we find that there appears to be a private dispute between the petitioner and opposite party nos.3 to 7 and a revision is also pending before the Board of Revenue. Therefore, this Court cannot issue any direction with regard to maintaining of status quo over the land in dispute.
5. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Board of Revenue for interim relief. September 22, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 9296 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench