1 2025:CGHC:4894 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 957 of 2019 M/s Madhyani Builders Ganapati Vihar Borsi Ward No. 51 Borsi Through Shri Devendra Madhyani S/o Shri Khemamal Madhayani, Aged About 36 Years R/o Kanwar Nagar Sindhi Colony Durg Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2- The Deputy Director Town And Country Planing Durg Behind Court Durg District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3- The Municipal Corporation Durg Through Commissioner District Durg District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4- The Building Construction Inspector Municipal Corporation Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) with WPC No. 1493 of 2019 Smt. Durgawati Pandey W/o Shri Ramesh Kant Pandey, Aged About 62 Years R/o 43/12 Mother Teresa Nagar, Camp - 01, Ward - 21, Supela, Bhilai District Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE 2 2 - Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Durg, Near New Bus Stand, Gaurav Path Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shri Devendra Madhyani S/o Shri Khemamal Madhyani, Aged About 36 Years Proprietor M/s Madhyani Builders, R/o Kanwar Nagar, Sindhi Colony, Durg Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Building Inspector Municipal Corporation Durg, Near New Bus Stand, Gaurav Path Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaideep Yadav and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocates For State : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondent No.3 & 4 in WPC No. 957 of 2019 & respondents No.2 & 4 in WPC No. 1493 of 2019 : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28.01.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time, these writ petitions have become infructuous. 2. Not opposed by the other side. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, these writ petitions are dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim