Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166267 (ALL)

RAMGOPAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND ANOTHER

CRLRD/478/2025 · 2025-09-25

Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 478 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the revisionist is taken on record. Order on C.M. Application No.2 of 2025 : Application for condonation of delay Heard Sri Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Badrul Hasan, learned A.G.A. for the State. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the revision. Office has reported a delay of 05 days in filing the revision. There is no objection by the learned A.G.A. On due consideration of the submissions and the grounds shown in the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay, the grounds are sufficient to condone the delay. The application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is hereby condoned. Order on Memo of Revision Heard Sri Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Badrul Hasan, learned A.G.A. for the State. On an objection raised by learned A.G.A. that the sanction order dated Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramgopal .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 28.10.2017 challenged in the revision has not been annexed with the revision whereas it should have been annexed with the revision, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he has filed the same alongwith the supplementary affidavit filed today. However, the order which has been challenged in the revision should have been annexed with the revision. In view of above, the revision is dismissed with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings and annexing relevant documents/orders. As prayed by learned counsel for the revisionist, office is directed to return certified copies of the relevant documents annexed with this revision after keeping photostat thereof on record to learned counsel for the revisionist. September 25, 2025 Saurabh CRLRD No. 478 of 2025 2 (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench