IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 COCP-296-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.08.2025 Satyavir Singh Mahlawat …Petitioner V/s Jitender Yadav and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate, for the respondents. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) CM-1053-CII-2021 Prayer in the present application preferred under Section 151 CPC is for placing on record Annexures P-1 to P-6 and for exemption from filing certified copies thereof. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Annexure P-1 to P-6 are taken on record. The Registry is directed to place the same at an appropriate place on the case file. CM-19751-CII-2024 Prayer in the present application preferred under Section 151 CPC is for placing on record the death certificate dated 28.12.2023 of the sole petitioner (Satyavir Singh Mahlawat) as Annexure P-7. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The death certificate dated 28.12.2023 is taken on record as Annexure P-7. The Registry is directed to place the same at an appropriate place on the case file. CM-19752-CII-2024 VIKAS CHANDER 2025.08.22 17.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-296-2021 -2- Prayer in the application preferred under Order XXII, Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC is for bringing on record the legal representatives of the sole petitioner-Satyavir Singh Mahlawat. It has been averred that the petitioner expired on 04.12.2023. It has been averred that apart from the legal representatives mentioned in para No.2 of the application, there are no other legal representatives of the petitioner. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is duly supported by affidavit of one of the legal representatives-Pareekshit Mahlawat, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Legal representatives as mentioned in para No.2 of the application are ordered to be brought on record. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. The Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place in the case file. COCP-296-2021 By way of the instant contempt petition, the petitioner alleges willful disobedience of order dated 01.12.2014 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP-25066-2013. 2. While disposing of CWP-25066-2013, a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 01.12.2014 held as under:- “Consequently, we set aside the order dated 12.06.2013 and declare the petitioner to be eligible for allotment of a plot in lieu of his land acquired. However, the claim of the petitioner for allotment of a plot shall be considered as and when respondents decide to publish an advertisement for allotment of plots for the oustees in terms of the directions of this Court in Sandeep’s case (supra). The present writ petition is disposed of accordingly.” VIKAS CHANDER 2025.08.22 17.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-296-2021 -3- 3. Thereafter, an advertisement dated 03.09.2018 (Annexure P-2) was issued, pursuant to which, the petitioner applied. However, the petitioner was not allotted a plot and his name came to be published in the list of rejected applicants at Sr. No.95 (Annexure P-6). 4. The petitioner then approached this Court by way of the instant contempt petition. 5. Concededly, in compliance of orders passed from time to time, a plot stands allotted to the petitioner vide allotment letter dated 31.08.2024 (Annexure R-1). 6. The sole grievance of the petitioner, at this stage, is that vide the letter of allotment, the rates prevalent in the year 2024 are being charged whereas, the rates prevalent in the year 2018 when the advertisement was issued should have been charged. 7. In the considered opinion of this Court, the said grievance is outside the scope of the instant contempt petition. The petitioner may, however, if so advised, avail all such remedies as shall be admissible in law. 8. For, the orders passed by the Division Bench stand complied with, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court. 9. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE August 21, 2025 vcgarg Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2025.08.22 17.36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document