Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16624 (RAJ)

M/S PINKCITY HOLIDAY TOURS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSR/149/2025 · 2025-05-01

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18319] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No. 149/2025 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 722/2025 1. M/s Pinkcity Holiday Tours, Through Proprietor/ Authorized Signatory Mahendra Singh Address A-119, Indira Verma Colony Shastri Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) 2. Mahendra Singh, Proprietor/authorized Signatory M/s. Pinkcity Holiday Tours Address A-119, Indra Verma Colony Shastri Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. M/.s Hotel Jaiupr, (A Unit Rajasthan State Hotels Corporation Ltd, Jaipur) (A Govt. Rajasthan Under Taking) Through Senior Manager Shri Vishal Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Nathulal Sharma Aged About 47 Years Address Hotel Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Beniwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 01/05/2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for suspension of sentence. The revision petition has been filed against the order dated 29.11.2023 passed by the learned trial Court in Criminal Complaint No.124/2019, whereby, the accused-petitioner has [2025:RJ-JP:18319] (2 of 3) [SOSR-149/2025 in CRLR-722/2025] been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to undergo one year simple imprisonment along with fine of Rs.1,20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo one month simple imprisonment. An appeal was preferred by the accused against the said order which was dismissed by the learned appellate Court while affirming/modifying the order of the learned trial Court. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner was on bail during trial and is presently behind the bars. Learned counsel also submits that his financial position is not sound. However, he is ready to deposit the amount as ordered by this Court. Considering the provision of Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and facts and circumstances of the case, this application for suspension of sentence is allowed. The sentence of the accused-applicant namely, Mahendra Singh (Proprietor/authorized Signatory of M/s. Pinkcity Holiday Tours) is suspended till final disposal of the revision petition, provided he deposits a sum of Rs.30,000/- by way of Demand Draft in the name of complainant in the learned trial Court and also furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 04.06.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. It is also ordered that the original Demand Draft shall be delivered to the complainant subject to an undertaking to be furnished by the complainant in the learned trial Court to the effect that in case the revision petition is decided against him, he [2025:RJ-JP:18319] (3 of 3) [SOSR-149/2025 in CRLR-722/2025] will refund the aforesaid amount along with interest @7% per annum. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court for compliance. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /20