HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5698 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 4. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent no.1, Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division Ayodhya, to decide the application for stay filed in Appeal No.2472/2025, nder Section 24[4] of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 "Ram Asrey and others vs. Ajay Kumar and others" expeditiously. 3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to consider and decide the application for stay filed in aforesaid appeal. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1, Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division Ayodhya,, to consider and decide the the application for stay filed in Appeal No.2472/2025, nder Section 24[4] of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 "Ram Asrey and others vs. Ajay Kumar and others", within a period of six Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kiran Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ram Asrey And Others .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received with regard to the respondents, and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioners to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5698 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench