Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166204 (ALL)

TRIBHUWAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5688/2025 · 2025-09-22

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5688 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Appeal No.1926/2024, "Naipal Singh and others vs. Tribhuwan Singh and others", under Section 331(3) of U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid appeal in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide Appeal No.1926/2024, "Naipal Singh and others vs. Tribhuwan Singh and others", under Section 331(3) of U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of eight Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Singh, Gargi Prakash Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Tribhuwan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5688 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench