CR-491-202 IN THE HIG 131 Mohit Bansa Tanvi Singla CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 07.11.2024 Family Cour 17 read wit further cross marriage of t No child wa from an eye such, the res parties and f of the Hindu on the grou dissolution o the HMA. It Teacher in H the aforesaid 2025 -1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA Bansal Versus Singla M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. LK Yadav, Advocate for th I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revisio 2024 (Annexure P-8), passed by t y Court, Rohtak, whereby the applica ad with Section 151 CPC, for recal r cross-examination was dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitio ge of the petitioner with respondent w ild was born out of the said wedloc an eye ailment which is termed to be the respondent-wife had sought annulm and filed a petition (Annexure P-1) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short e ground of deception and fraud, ution of marriage by way of decree of A. It is submitted that the responden er in Haryana Government in the yea esaid petition for annulment of marr D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-491-2025 Date of Decision: 27.01.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA for the petitioner. evision petition is to the order dated by the learned Principal Judge, pplication under Order XVII Rule recalling the respondent-wife for petitioner, inter alia, submits that dent was solemnized on 14.11.2017. edlock. The petitioner is suffering to be Retinitis Pigmentosa and as annulment of marriage between the 1) under Section 12(i)(C) of the short-‘the HMA’) in the year 2020, fraud, in alternate a petition for cree of divorce under Section 13 of ondent-wife was appointed as PGT he year 2019 which led to filing of f marriage. However, the petitioner ated dge, ule for that 017. ring d as the the for 3 of GT g of oner RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-491-202 had also file Earlier, the Court, Fate 29.08.2023 passed in TA prayed that set aside and examine the learned coun the case, bu conscience a Notice of M matter; the It is directed cross-examin costs of ₹ Authority, R 27.01.2025 rishu 2025 -2- filed a petition under Section 9 the petition (Annexure P-1) was Fatehabad to the Family Court, 2023 (Annexure P-3) passed by a co in TA-810-2023, titled as ‘Mohit B that the impugned order dated 07.11 de and the petitioner may be granted o ne the respondent-wife, subject to paym Heard. Having given thoughtful consid d counsel for the petitioner and withou se, but in view of principles of n ence and fair play; this petition is bein of Motion to the respondent as tha the impugned order dated 07.11.202 irected that the petitioner be granted examine the respondent-wife, at his ₹10,000/- to be deposited with rity, Rohtak. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 9 of the HMA on 12.11.2020. was transferred from the Family Court, Rohtak, vide order dated a co-ordinate Bench of this Court ohit Bansal Vs. Tanvi Singla’. It is 07.11.2024 (Annexure P-8) may be anted only one opportunity to cross- to payment of reasonable costs. consideration to the submissions of without commenting upon merits of s of natural justice, equity, good is being disposed of without issuing as that will only further delay be 1.2024 (Annexure P-8) is set aside. ranted one effective opportunity to his own responsibility, subject to with the District Legal Services any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 020. mily ated ourt It is y be s of ts of ood uing be side. y to t to ices RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.