Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16618 (JHR)

ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI And ANR v. DIRECTOR S.E., HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

A.C.(S.B.)/16/2011 · 2025-07-01

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:17455 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.C. (S.B.) No.16 of 2011 1. Ashok Kumar Tiwari son of Shree Krishnadeo Nath Tiwari, Lashkhana Road, P.O., P.S. & Dist. – Latehar. 2. Jagatpal Sahu son of Late Bishun Sahu, Village – Mako, P.O., P.S. & Dist. – Latehar … Appellants Versus 1. The Director (Secondary Education), Human Resources Development Department, Telephone Bhawan. H.E.C. Area, Dhurwa, Ranchi, P.O. + P.S.- Dhurwa, Dist.- Ranchi 2. The President, Managing Committee, Gandhi Inter College, Latehar, P.O. & P.S. – Latehar, Dist. – Latehar. 3. The Secretary Managing Committee, Gandhi Inter College, Latehar, P.O. & P.S. – Latehar, Dist. – Latehar. 4. The Secretary Jharkhand Academic Council, Bargawan, Namkum, Ranchi, P.O. + P.S. – Namkum Dist. Ranchi. 5. The District Education Officer, Latehar, P.O., P.S. & Dist.- Latehar. 6. The Principal, Gandhi Inter College, Latehar, P.O. & P.S.- Latehar, Dist.- Latehar. … Respondents Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Appellants : None For the J.A.C. : Ms. Risheeta Singh, Adv., A.C. to Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Adv. Order No.16/Dated- 01.07.2025 1. None appears on behalf of the appellants though learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. It appears from the previous order sheets dated 23.07.2012, 20.08.2013, 03.01.2019, 06.04.2023, 05.01.2024, 01.03.2024 and 12.02.2025 that the frequent time has been taken by learned counsel for the appellants but no effective step is being taken for hearing of this appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed for default. 3. Pending I.As., if any, also stand dismissed. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Sachin