CR-498-202 IN THE HIG 133 Mohit Bansa Tanvi Singla CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 13.12.2024 Family Cour by Court ord Act, 1955 (Annexure P including se conclude his marriage of t No child wa from an eye such, the res 2025 -1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA Bansal Versus Singla M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. LK Yadav, Advocate for th I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revisio 2024 (Annexure P-5), passed by t y Court, Rohtak, whereby evidence of urt order in a petition filed under Sec 1955 (for short-‘the HMA’) for r xure P-1), on the ground that altho ing several last opportunities have bee de his evidence, yet he has failed to do Learned counsel for the petitio ge of the petitioner with respondent w ild was born out of the said wedloc an eye ailment which is termed to be the respondent-wife had sought annulm D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-498-2025 Date of Decision: 27.01.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA for the petitioner. evision petition is to the order dated by the learned Principal Judge, nce of the petitioner has been closed er Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage for restitution of conjugal rights t although numerous opportunities ve been granted to the petitioner to d to do so. petitioner, inter alia, submits that dent was solemnized on 14.11.2017. edlock. The petitioner is suffering to be Retinitis Pigmentosa and as annulment of marriage between the ated dge, osed iage ities that 017. ring d as the RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-498-202 parties and f 2020, on the dissolution o the HMA. It Teacher in H the aforesaid had filed the on 12.11.202 of learned A Court of com (Annexure TA-175-202 the impugne and the peti entire eviden learned coun the case, bu conscience a Notice of M matter; the It is directed conclude h 2025 -2- and filed a petition under Section 12( on the ground of deception and frau ution of marriage by way of decree of A. It is submitted that the responden er in Haryana Government in the yea oresaid petition for annulment of marr led the present petition (Annexure P- 11.2020. Earlier, the present petition w rned Additional Civil Judge (Senior of competent jurisdiction at Rohtak, xure P-2) passed by a co-ordinate B 2021, titled as ‘Tanvi Singla Vs. M pugned order dated 13.12.2024 (Ann e petitioner may be granted only one evidence, subject to payment of reason Heard. Having given thoughtful consid d counsel for the petitioner and withou se, but in view of principles of n ence and fair play; this petition is bein of Motion to the respondent as tha the impugned order dated 13.12.202 irected that the petitioner be granted de his entire evidence before the lear 12(i)(C) of the HMA in the year d fraud, in alternate a petition for cree of divorce under Section 13 of ondent-wife was appointed as PGT he year 2019 which led to filing of f marriage. However, the petitioner -1) under Section 9 of the HMA ition was transferred from the Court enior Division), Dera Bassi to the ohtak, vide order dated 02.05.2022 ate Bench of this Court passed in Vs. Mohit Bansal’. It is prayed that (Annexure P-5) may be set aside ly one opportunity to conclude his reasonable costs. consideration to the submissions of without commenting upon merits of s of natural justice, equity, good is being disposed of without issuing as that will only further delay be .2024 (Annexure P-5) is set aside. ranted one effective opportunity to e learned Family Court, Rohtak, at year for 3 of GT g of oner MA ourt the d in that side s of ts of ood uing be side. y to , at RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-498-202 his own resp the District L 27.01.2025 rishu 2025 -3- n responsibility, subject to costs of strict Legal Services Authority, Rohtak Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ts of ₹10,000/- to be deposited with Rohtak. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No with RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.27 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.