Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16617 (KAR)

DR SHIVALEELA PATIL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3779/2025 · 2025-05-02

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:18101 WP No. 3779 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 3779 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: DR. SHIVALEELA PATIL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, D/O PRABHUGOUDA PATIL, RESIDING AT ANANDA NILAYA, 2ND CROSS, B BLOCK, GANDHINAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA-577201. …PETITIONER (BY MISS. MANJULA MUNAVALLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT AGRICULTURE M S BUILDING, BANGALORE -560001 2. THE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, BANGALORE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES GKVK CAMPUS, BANGALORE-560065. 3. THE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, BANGALORE REGISTER, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, GKVK CAMPUS, BANGALORE-560065 4. THE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, BANGALORE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18101 WP No. 3779 of 2025 GKVK CAMPUS, BANGALORE-560065 5. INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH R/BY. OFFICER OF ADMINISTRATION, KRISHI BHAVAN, DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, OPP. RAIL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU S. HIREMATH, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4; NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NO.5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 21.01.2025 BEARING NO. AO/RT/11/64/CURRENT POST/TEACH/AG.EXTN/ELIGIBLE AND NON ELIGIBLE LIST/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 does not dispute the above fact. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:18101 WP No. 3779 of 2025 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. In view of disposal of the writ petition, pending I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand disposed off. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within ten days. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68