Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166164 (ALL)

RANJEET KUMAR @ PINTU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/9357/2025 · 2025-09-22

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9357 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner complaining the appointment of opposite party no.6 for allottment of Fair Price Shop. 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was also eligible to be considered but has not been considered. 3. Without going to the merits of the case, as the appointment has already been made, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the appointment by pressing an appeal, if so advised, in accordance with law. 4. In view of above, this petition stands dismissed. September 22, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Shanker Singh, Kirti Veer Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ranjeet Kumar @ Pintu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Food And Civil Supplies U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench