Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 166160 (ALL)

PINKU ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME SECTT. LKO.

BAIL/9031/2025 · 2025-09-19

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9031 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Asrey Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shikhar Srivastava, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 609 of 2025, under Sections 309(4), 317(2) B.N.S., registered at Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 30.07.2025 stating that while the informant's mother was plucking flowers two persons came on a rickshaw and snatched away her earrings and after threatening her they went away on the same rickshaw. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is a poor rickshaw puller, he is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. The applicant has been arrested along with another accused person Jitu Mishra on the basis of an information received from a mukhbir on 31.07.2025 itself and earring of yellow metal was recovered from him. Both the accused persons have confessed their involvement in commission of offence and the complainant identified her earrings as well as the accused persons. 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Asarey Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pinku Ali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) of the State has opposed the prayer for and he has submitted the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge sheet has already been submitted on 18.08.2025. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 31.07.2025 and the investigation already stands concluded and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant-Pinku Ali be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 19, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 9031 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench