Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16616 (GAU)

PRADIP PAUL v. CHODEN, CID NO 0215507

I.A.(Civil)/2354/2025 · 2025-07-29

Robin Phukan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010163532025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2354/2025 PRADIP PAUL S/O LT. SADESH PAUL, VILL.- TULSHIBARI, P.S.- RANGIA, DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM. 781354 2: TRIPTIRANI PAUL W/O PRADIP PAUL R/O VILLAGE TULSHIBARI RANGIA KAMRUP ASSAM 78135 VERSUS CHODEN, CID NO 0215507 R/O BUNALCHA, CHAPEHA CHUKHA, BHUTAN. PERMANENET ADDRESS- CHODEN CIMENT AGENT. GEDU BHUTAN, P.S.- GEDU, DIST.- CHUKHA, BHUATN. 2:PANKAJ RAI S/O A RAI R/O GAURIGAON PULBAZAR DRJEELINGS P.S.- PULBAZAR DIST.- DARJEELING WEST BENGAL. 73412 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P BHARDWAJ, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 30.07 .2025 Mr. P. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has the instruction to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh application. Taking note of the submission of Mr. Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the applicant, this interlocutory application with the connected MAC Appeal stands disposed of on withdrawal. However, liberty will remain with the applicant to approach the learned Tribunal by filing appropriate petition under Section 166 of the M.V. Act. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE