HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9090 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. (Order on Amendment Application) 1. By means of the instant application, the applicant has sought correction of the applicant's name in the memo of bail application so as to make it "Lukman" instead of "Lokman". 2. The amendment sought is short in nature. 3. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant is directed to make necessary amendment forthwith. (Order on Memo of Bail Application) 1. Heard Shri Alok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Shikhar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.264 of 2025 under Sections 109(1)/190/191(2)/191(3)/351(2) of B.N.S. and 3/25 Arms Act & 4/25 of Arms Act registered at Police Station- Hydrabad, District- Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 25.07.2025 against 14 persons, including the applicant, stating that all the accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members because of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lokman .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) a petty dispute between the children. Seven persons from the side of the informant have received injuries in the incident though all the injuries were reported to be simple in nature. 4. An FIR No.265/2025 regarding the same incident was lodged from the applicant's side also against the persons from the informant's side stating that the persons from the informant's side have assaulted the persons from the applicant's side causing injuries to three persons. The injury report of the injuries suffered by three persons from the applicant's side have been annexed with the affidavit filed in support of the application. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 6. Co-accused Sirajuddin, Azam Khan and Parvej have been granted bail by means of orders dated 08.09.2025, 11.09.2025 & 18.09.2025 passed by this Court in Bail Application Nos.8471 of 2025, 8450 of 2025 & 8938 of 2025 respectively. 7. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application and he has submitted that investigation of the present case is still pending. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the persons from both the sides have received injuries in the incident but there is no mention regarding the injuries suffered by persons from the applicant's side in the FIR which indicates that the FIR does not disclose the complete facts; all the injuries suffered in the incident were simple in nature; that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 26.07.2025, and co-accused Sirajuddin, Azam Khan and Parvej have already been granted bail I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Lukman be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- BAIL No. 9090 of 2025 2 (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 24, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9090 of 2025 3 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench