SHESHRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 13 OTHERS
/999/2025 · 2025-09-23
Prashant Kumar, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166151 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166151 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 999 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Learned Standing Counsel has instructions to inform the Court that encroachment existing on gata no.679, which is recorded as rasta has been removed and there was no encroachment on gata no.344. As regards gata no.825 is recorded in the name of a bhumidhar with transferable rights.
2. In view of the aforesaid, we see no reason to proceed any further. However, if there is any encroachment on any public land then appropriate proceedings shall be initiated by the concerned under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 or otherwise under the relevant law, which may be applicable subject to there being a cause and locus.
3. This Public Interest Litigation is, accordingly, disposed of. September 23, 2025 S.P. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimal Kishor Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Sheshram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench