HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5704 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 8.. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya to decide Revision No.1751 of 2024, "Ram Avtar and others vs. Vinay Kumar and other", expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid revision in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Divisional Commissioner, Ayodhya is directed to decide Revision No.1751 of 2024, "Ram Avtar and others vs. Vinay Kumar and other", expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajan Yadav, Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ripu Daman Shahi Ram Avtar And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) Devisional Commissioner, Ayodhya And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 KR A227 No. 5704 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench