Ct. No.4 D/L 24.09.2025 (Naba) 5-12 W.P.C.T. 69 of 2025 With CAN 1 of 2025 Dr. Niharika Ranjan Lal Vs. Union of India & Ors. With W.P.C.T. 70 of 2025 With CAN 1 of 2025 Dr. Susmita Chaudhuri Vs. Union of India & Ors. With W.P.C.T. 71 of 2025 Dr. Bijita Dutta Vs. Union of India & Ors. With W.P.C.T. 72 of 2025 Dr. Subhabrata Sengupta Vs. Union of India & Ors. With W.P.C.T. 96 of 2025 The Dean In Charge, ESI-PGIMSR, ESIC Medical College and ESIC Hospital and ODC(EZ) & Ors. Vs. Dr. Susmita Chaudhuri & Ors. With W.P.C.T. 97 of 2025 The Dean In Charge, ESI-PGIMSR, ESIC Medical College and ESIC Hospital and ODC(EZ) & Ors. Vs. Dr. Niharika Ranjan Lal & Ors. With 2 W.P.C.T. 98 of 2025 The Dean In Charge, ESI-PGIMSR, ESIC Medical College and ESIC Hospital and ODC(EZ) & Ors. Vs. Dr. Subhabrata Sengupta & Ors. With W.P.C.T. 99 of 2025 The Dean In Charge, ESI-PGIMSR, ESIC Medical College and ESIC Hospital and ODC(EZ) & Ors. Vs. Dr. Bijita Dutta & Ors. Mr. M.N. Roy (through VC) ...for the Petitioner (Sl. No. 5 to 8) Mr. Shiv Chandra Prasad, ...for the Petitioner (Sl. No. 9 to 12) ...for the respondents (Sl. No. 5 to 8) Mr. Kumaresh Dalal, Ms. Falguni Bandyopadhyay ...for the Union of India 1. The learned counsel, Mr. Roy, appearing through virtual mode submits that a direction be issued for refund of the amounts which have already been recovered. 2. We find no reason to pass any such order in view of the nature of the judgement passed in the writ proceedings. 3. It is needless to say that a consequence would require to follow. 4. The CAN applications are accordingly disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)