MAHAPARA BEGUM AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/11574/2025 · 2025-09-25
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166127 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166127 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11574 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents no.1 to 3 and Abhay Dixit, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4.
2. No notice be issued to respondent no.5 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is finally disposed off.
4. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following main reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to calculate the interest on GPF amount and to pay the same forthwith. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to pay the interest on the due amount till making of actual payment."
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit a fresh individual representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection.
6. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit individual representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Singh Rajawat, Abdul Shadab Khan, Purnima Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi Mahapara Begum And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 25, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 11574 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench