DINESH CHANDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8191/2025 · 2025-09-25
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166096 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166096 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8191 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the prayer clause -II
2. Learned A.G.A. has no objection. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the prayer is allowed. The prayer clause -II is strucked out from the prayer clause. 4.. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 5. The instant application has been filed with the main prayer:-
"I. Wherefore it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the order dated 25.10.2024 passed by District & Session Judge, District Sultanpur in Criminal Miscellaneous Case (Transfer Application) No.383 of 2024, "Dinesh Chandra Sharma Vs. State of UP & Another", Under Section 408 Cr.P.C only to the extent of imposing the cost of Rs.2000 on Transfer Application of the petitioner as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition. 6. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the matter has been settled between the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide the settlement agreement dated 7.12.2024 and therefore, the criminal proceedings arising out of case crime no. 136 of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dinesh Chandra Sharma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
2012 is of no consequence. He submitted that revision petition was also filed wherein order has been passed on 25.10.2024 and the application no. 3 Kha moved therein was rejected with a cost of Rs. 2000/-. He submits that the order to the extent of imposing the cost may be set aside. 7. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid contention. 8. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, particularly the fact that the parties have settled their dispute and there seems to be no consequence of any criminal proceedings pending before the trial court, the order of imposing the cost of Rs. 2000/- upon the applicant is hereby set aside, to that extent. 9. The application is allowed accordingly.
September 25 , 2025 Anuj Singh A482 No. 8191 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench