HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8036 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned trial court not to insist the petitioner to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every four cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all four cases. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in four cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1) Case Crime No. 583 of 2020 under Sections 409,420,467, 468,471 & 120B of I.P.C, PS - Gomti Nagar,, District - Lucknow. 2) Case Crime No. 107 of 2020 under Sections 409,420,467, 468,471 & 120B of I.P.C. PS - Bakshi Ka Talab, District - Lucknow. 3) Case Crime No. 733 of 2021 under sections 409,420,467, 468,471 & 120B of I.P.C. P.S.- Gomti Nagar District Lucknow. 4) Case Crime No. 665 of 2021 under sections 409,420,467, 468,471 & 120B of I.P.C. P.S. Gomti Nagar District Lucknow. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Vikram Shahi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep Pandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. September 19, 2025 Mayank A482 No. 8036 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench