HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9052 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Sukh Deo Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Satyendra Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.534 of 2025 under Sections 316(5) of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 09.07.2025 by the Chief Administrative Officer, District Court, Sultanpur stating that the applicant, who is a reader in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Musafirkhana, had obtained fine receipt books but he did not deposit the fine receipt books in the Court. In spite of the notice issued to him, the applicant did not appear before the Court and he was suspended. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. The applicant's involvement in another case has been disclosed in para 46 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application in which he has been granted bail. 6. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant annexing therewith certain documents showing that the receipt books in question had not been issued to the applicant but the same had been issued to the Alhamad of the Court. 6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that investigation in the present case is still going on. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukh Deo Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Faiz Alam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the contention of the applicant that the receipt books in question have not been received by him and that the applicant being an employee of the Court, there appears to be no apprehension of him absconding from the process of law, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Faiz Alam be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 24, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 9052 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench